Search This Blog

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Yeh Kahan Ka Insaaf Hai?

The people at rediff have raised a very painful point. I don't think that was intentional but shows the warped way the Indian government and the judiciary looks at issues. These two reports appeared one after another. One report has ULFA leader getting bail and the other has bail being denied to the alleged Malegaon blast accused. We have known secessionists, seditionists, terrorists and other assortment of anti Indian thugs roaming around with no fear of any repercussion. But the one solitary case where the police caught a couple of Hindus is being used to make an example of how tough Indian laws are.

Who are these people fooling really?

ULFA chief Arabinda Rajkhowa granted bail
Raising hopes for a peace process to take place between the banned United Liberation Front of Assam and the government of India , a designated court in Guwahati on Thursday granted bail to the self-styled 'chairman' of the outfit Arabinda Rajkhowa in all the six TADA cases pending against him.
The article can be read at:
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ulfa-chief-arabinda-rajkhowa-granted-bail/20101230.htm

Malegaon blast case: Bail plea of Col Purohit, two other accused rejected
A special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act court on Thursday rejected the bail pleas of three accused including Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, arrested in the September 2008 Malegaon blast case, after accepting the prosecution's argument that if released on bail the accused would indulge in unlawful activities. Purohit and two other accused -- Rakesh Dhawde and Ajay Rahirkar -- had sought for bail stating that they have been falsely implicated and that since the chargesheet has been filed in the case, their custody was not required further.
The article can be read at:
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/malegaon-blast-case-bail-plea-of-col-purohit-two-other-accused-rejected/20101230.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment