Who Is Afraid Of Modi?

Delhi is a power center. Power is corrupting and blinding. It gives rise to a different class of elites, the kind who use influence as a currency. Now what if you are not in power but in opposition? How do you enjoy the benefits of power? As they say, in politics, you do not have permanent friends but permanent interests (I may have paraphrased). A lot of “I scratch your back and you scratch mine” goes on. Everyone uses everyone else. This beast in self sustaining and incestuous. Atalji, as it is said, was an admirer of Nehru. He also was close to Delhi’s power center even though he belonged to RSS and then Janasangha. He was a consummate insider. So even when he came to power, other insiders (including the ones from Congress and other opposition parties) had little to fear (on a personal basis of course). Rumor has it that Rahul Gandhi found himself in trouble with the US authorities at the airport in Boston. Atalji’s government stepped in a saved his bacon. No one from Congress or for that matter any party had to answer for their crimes. No efforts were made to bring back the black money stashed abroad. Despite his personal honesty and efficiency, Atalji looked and felt like a Congressman in Saffron. Now all this happened when someone as clean and as good as Atalji was in charge. We all know what happened during the Sonia Gandhi rule over the last decade. No one had anything to fear. Delhi operated with impunity.

I am quite sure that if Advani or any other BJP member was to become the PM, Delhi and people in it would not be afraid. Corruption would not have been as rampant (or not there at all) but the guilty would not have been punished, thanks to the Delhi effect. Unfortunately for the Delhi insiders, an absolute outsider like Modi is casting his large shadow over Delhi. This is scaring the hell out of so many people. Why is that? Let us go through the sub-classes of the Delhi insiders and the possible reasons for their fear.

Delhi based BJP leadership: As we have seen that the BJP was all but destroyed in many states. While Modi and his team have resuscitated a moribund BJP in many states, thanks to the damage done over the last decade by the pathetic leadership of Advani and co. we now are forced to suck up to wretches like Chandrababu Naidu. We are non-existent in West Bengal and fighting an uphill battle in Karnataka and Odisha. Most of the Delhi based BJP leaders’ approach was to be the “Not Congress” i.e. win because of anti-incumbency rather than their performance. These people let their so-called allies run the BJP out of those states. With Modi running on a performance platform, these people find themselves at a loss. Sushma Swaraj who has little influence over any voter base thinks of herself as a national leader. Why? Such leaders are being sidelined and with any luck, will not be part of the next government.

Politicians from Congress: With BJP leaders like Atalji and Advani, the Gandhi family and others close to it could have expected concessions over matters like corruption and black money. If, All the Gods willing, Modi becomes the PM then we will have the first true outsider who is not a power elite or beholden to any power center as a PM. With no loyalties to anyone except the voters, Modi is expected to make corrupt politicians and their relatives accountable and bring them to justice for all the crimes committed. This is what was said in a report from Economic Times:

The move is part of the BJP's strategy to no longer treat Vadra with kid gloves. It marks a break from the omerta or code of silence that top leaders of the two national parties appeared to observe for years with regard to each other's close family members. 

(Omerta, BTW, is a code used by the Italian Mafia)

Without Modi at the helm, this would not have been possible and Sonia Gandhi’s damaad would have been treated as the national damaad even by the BJP.

Media: Barring some vernacular press, most of the media is beholden to leftist causes in ways of the communist China. What that means is that communism (or socialism if that fails) for all but the privileged). As was seen with the association of these “presstitues” in the 2G scam, these so called keepers of the truth are as corrupt as the politicians they pretend to hold accountable. The likes of Tarun Tejpal are clearly scared because the man they have vilified so badly on orders of their political bosses, has a good chance of occupying the top job. They will lose the proximity to that post and the power that comes with it. Rumors are that a top bureaucrat was suspended and is on the run because he connected a top Congress minister, the head of a top media house a very large amount of money stashed abroad. Mischief like that will not be possible under “friendless” Modi.

Leftists: This group wants the country to do well on THEIR terms or not well at all. They have a perverted vision of the future of the country and a vision contrary to theirs is often met with deceit / sophistry at best and violence at worst. This group has worked with various anti Indian groups with some sort of a common aim. Three recent articles (URLs provided below) demonstrate the hypocrisy and downright traitorous behavior of this group. They are afraid of Modi because if “Modinomics” starts to work for the nation as it has for Gujarat then the entire leftist machinery will stand discredited. The leftist fear of Modi gets compounded by their hatred for him. After all, the leftists can be classified between two sorts:

a.   Belonging to one group are these so called intellectuals (whose real achievements cannot even fill a postcard) who are English speaking elites belonging to upper castes who cannot stand that they have been bested by a guy whom they will not even spit upon while going from one booze soaked soiree to another.

b.   Belonging to the other group are these Maoist types whose violent approach will be met with firm if not disproportionately larger force at the hands of a potential Modi administration.

Islamic terrorists and their sympathizers: This is a dangerous group with members like the SIMI, IM or men like  Owaisi or Zakir Naik. A potential Modi administration is not going to procrastinate on firm decisions on this group or kick the can down the road and turn a blind eye to anti-national activities for votes. I do not see a repeat of the Kandahaar episode with Modi at the helm. I can see that justice will be done and punishments meted out in a timely fashion so we do not have terrorists waiting in our jails for the Pakistanis to hijack our planes for their release. If this group is not scared then they should be.

Muslim Demagogues: This group comprises of Demagogues like Bukhari, various Maulanas, Azam Khan, Owaisi and self-styled protectors of Muslim interests and votebank politicians like Mullayam Yadav, Mamata Bannerjee, Congress etc. This group benefits if the Muslims voters stay ignorant, poor and scared. Why do you think that there are more Hindu Muslim riots in states ruled by people belonging to this group? On the other hand, why do you think that Muslims in Gujarat are much bigger supporters of Modi than non Gujarati Muslims? The answer is clear. Gujarati Muslims have benefitted from the non-discriminatory and all-inclusive “Modinomics”. Gujarati Muslims are more prosperous and better informed than their brethren from UP or Bihar. That is why the pseudo-secular writ is important in non-BJP states. Allah forbid, if the brass workers from Moradabad start doing better under BJP rule because they will get better power and market infrastructure then why would they need Azam Khan or Bukhari’s suggestion on voting?

While these aforementioned groups have their own prejudices and perceived reasons to fear a Modi Prime-ministership, the only group which should really fear a Hindu nationalist is the group which stands in the way of our collective path forward and national safety.

URL to the Economic Times report is as follows:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-makes-sonia-gandhis-son-in-law-robert-vadra-a-major-campaign-issue/articleshow/34016091.cms

Prof. Nalapat’s eye opener on the collusion between US state Department and our leftists can be read at:http://www.sunday-guardian.com/news/obama-quietly-reverses-hillarys-get-modi-policy

An in depth analysis of the vicious Leftist-NGO nexus can be read at the following:http://www.niticentral.com/2014/04/18/aap-part-of-international-anti-india-racket-part-1-213357.html

http://www.niticentral.com/2014/04/19/aap-part-of-international-anti-india-racket-part-2-213876.html

Shri Narendra Modi's Message to all Voters

America Does Not Want Modi To Win

There is a saying in Urdu – “Begaani shaadi may Abdullah diwaana”. It means that Abdulla is going crazy over someone else getting married. Now the elections in India should be a matter for Indians to either get excited about (if you are the supporter of the perceived front-runner) or concern (if your party is on the verge of defeat). India’s immediate neighbors also have something to think about because the new PM could be a pliant weakling or a strong nationalist. For countries beyond our borders, especially the ones beyond the reach of our missiles, Indian elections should be an awe inspiring democratic exercise at best and an amusing spectacle at worst. Our trading partners have dealt with a socialist regime for over a decade. Now either they will deal with the same socialist government or deal with a more business friendly regime. Ideally they should have nothing to worry about, right?

Wrong.

It seems that anti India Americans, a group adorned (much like a heap of excrement on a manicured lawn) by non-resident Indian leftists or people under their influence are testifying before a perpetual anti Indian Congressman Tom Lantos. Testifying before him is Katrina Lantos (how convenient), John Dayal, Robin Phillips and Joe Pitts (US Congressman on the payroll of Ghulam Nabi Fai who has spent time in jail on charges of spying for Pakistan). I am surprised that Angana Chatterji, Vijay Prashad (nephew of Brinda Karat), Biju Matthew and assorted Anti Indians were not there with their knives. The testimonies were the usual about Hindus, RSS and other groups. Are they trying to influence Indian elections? Yes. Can they really do something about it? The answer to that, thanks all the gods, is a resounding NO. But that is not stopping them from trying. In fact the US, the so called protectors and keepers of Democracy have done all they can to undermine Indian democracy. And it is not just this election. They do so because they want to control, to the best of their abilities, the way India behaves with the rest of the world. It could be racism or because we are followers of a cult / lesser religion called Hinduism. All the Congress PMs have been pliant weaklings. The solo BJP PM so far was a Congressman in Saffron clothing. The thought of Modi as PM, a strong Hindu nationalist, is a scary one to the Americans. Fortunately for us, all their efforts to stop Modi have come to a naught. This latest hearing is the last stand against Narendra Modi, much like the man standing in front of a tsunami with an umbrella.

My response to Tom Lantos and the rest of the people testifying before him is a typical American response: You can kiss my dark brown, hirsute posterior (of course I am paraphrasing).

If Lantos’ constituents find out the amount of money that the US has given in aid to Pakistan since 1947 (especially after correcting for inflation), they would be shocked. If they are truly unbiased people then they will be even more shocked to hear that the percentage of Hindus in Pakistan since 1947 has gone down from 12 to 2. The shock would be greater if they find out how that number has gone down. They will be really flabbergasted to see that their beloved Congressman and his ilk whom they have been electing over and over again like brainless automatons have done absolutely NOTHING about that. Meanwhile the only country where Muslims can not only freely vote but also influence the polity gets berated by the likes of Lantos on a daily basis. Shame on these charlatans!

It is one thing for a leftist rag to write negatively about Hindu conservatives. But for elected officials of a country like US to take stands of this kind is not right. You see, if the next PM of India can jump start the Indian economy and ignore the US and its banks then who is the loser? Isn’t Lantos letting his personal prejudice hurt the Americans? The Europeans, Japanese (Shinzo Abe is looking forward to Modi getting elected) and Chinese have been doing business with Gujarat for a while. I don’t think that Russians or African or South American countries find it distasteful to do business with Hindu nationalists. I would humbly remind Lantos that the US used to and still does business with some of the scummiest people in the world.

My appeal to the Americans is as follows: Please let us exercise our right to vote whomever we want to chose. Stand with us and celebrate Democracy. Otherwise stop preaching and changing regimes the world over in the name of democracy.

Article on Lantos hearing can be read at: http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-bjp-govt-would-be-detrimental-to-minorities-us-lawmakers-told/20140405.htm
Article on Shinzo Abe can be read at: http://southasia.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/02/20/big_in_japan_why_abe_is_rooting_for_a_modi_win

Rope-a-dope Modi VS Limp-wristed Left

Rope-a-dope was a technique perfected by boxing great Muhammad Ali who would stand against the ropes, which allows much of the opponent’s punch's energy to be absorbed by the ropes' elasticity rather than the his body. The opponent tires himself out after which Ali used his energy to beat his opponent.

The entire Congress machinery aided by the leftist media and NGOs used Godhra as a way to beat Modi for twelve years. Modi absorbed those punches using his performance in Gujarat as his protective ropes. He won three state elections in the interim. He used social media as counter punches with meticulous planning which in my opinion will become a case study for future politicians. Every move that he has made so far speaks of his political and organizational genius. The Indian political landscape which was in ruins thanks to a decade long inept BJP leadership and raping and pillaging of the land by Congress led UPA, now seems to be ready for a spring. Yes. Time has come for Modi, the Muhammad Ali of politics to wreak havoc on his political opponents.

We have written way too many times on this topic but after seeing Rajdeep Sardesai attack MJ Akbar and Akbar’s weak defense, I felt compelled to revisit the topic. Sardesai is a smart guy and knows that his (and his ilk’s) 12 year crusade against Narendra Modi lies in ruins. Akbar’s change of heart seems like the straw that broke the leftist’s back. Elitist snobs, who speak English fluently, wear fancy suits, drive around in German cars, attend Christmas masses without being of the faith, fancy themselves as the keepers of the Indian secularism, pretend to fight for the very man he adroitly exploits and treats everything Hindu and Indian as an invective finds himself outsmarted and completely defeated by a common Hindu conservative man, a real aam aadmi like Narendra Modi (NOT YOU Kejriwal! Modi is the real aam aadmi). That was the demeanor of Sardesai. I only wish Akbar had done a better job defending his stand. It is Akbar’s bad luck that he now realizes that the best hope for the country’s betterment lies with the kind of man he has deplored all his life and the kind of ideology he has berated. I really like MJ Akbar and enjoy his wisdom even though I may not agree with him all the time. He will bring a different point of view to the party which will be welcome in a party with real internal democracy.

The road to the present was not a smooth one and the road ahead promises to be bumpier. Having bested his enemies outside the part with his own brand of political rope-a-dope, Modi seems to be battling the enemies inside. The intrepid Madhu Kishwar claims that there exists a cabal within BJP which she calls the 160 club. As per her, this club is doing its best to restrict the number of seats won by the BJP to 160 which will enable the vultures within the party to step in and take over the reins. Efforts of this cabal (no need to name names because everyone knows who they are) are evident but seem to be failing. For a pugilist like Modi who has been battling his entire career, this cabal is the proverbial small potato.

One of the things that seem to be bothering a lot of BJP supporters (and rightly so) are the induction of erstwhile Modi baiters. However I am going to put that in the file called realpolitik. Due to pathetic leadership of the BJP in the last decade, the party was all but wiped out in a number of states. To win those states back, ugly choices had to be made. At the end of the day, I have to put my faith with a winner like Modi. Hopefully Baba Bholenath will protect him from Islamic terrorists and the voters will find it in their hearts to brave the elements and come out in large numbers to vote. We really are fighting for the future of the country. We can elect rope-a-dope Modi or any of the limp-wristed leftists. Speaking of leftists, please look at the picture above. Leaders are supposed to inspire. Does this guy look like he can inspire anyone?

Kejriwal Practices Al Taqiyya, Covers Virulent Agenda

Taqiyya is defined as follows by the Wikipedia

In Islam taqiyya is a form of religious dissimulation, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are at risk of significant persecution.
This practice was emphasized in Shi'a Islam whereby adherents may conceal their religion when they are under threat, persecution, or compulsion.Taqiyya was developed to protect Shi'ites who were usually in minority and under pressure. The term taqiyya does not exist in Sunni jurisprudence. In the Sunni view, denying faith under duress is "only at most permitted and not under all circumstances obligatory". However, there are examples of practicing taqiyya among Sunnis where it was necessary.

In face of persecution and death, deception seems an acceptable form of strategy. However, since the concept has been incorporated in religion, it eventually gets used to mask human frailties, greed, expansionism (land and Islam) and worse. It is now believed people that Islamists lie and cheat to the Kafirs (non-believers) to spread their religion, carry out their Jihad and other activities using Taqiyya as an excuse. Why else would something initiated by the Shias become acceptable to the Sunnis?

Now why would Islamists practice Taqiyya? It could be that it suits their selfish reasons or that they have an agenda worth lying and cheating. Now a cult leader who has to brainwash followers would resort to his own brand of Taqiyya. These cult leaders honestly believe in their agenda and thus feel justified in lying and cheating. For them the all important end justifies any and every means.

One such cult leader is Arvind Kejriwal. Why am I calling him a cult leader? It is because if you talk to multiple AAP followers, they spout off exactly the same issues, theories and solutions. It is almost like there is a book somewhere or a grand priest (Arvind Kejriwal) who teaches them answers to political FAQs.

The most recent expose where Kejriwal is colluding with a pliant media person to “fix” and interview clearly shows that contempt he has for the middle class (ironically these are the people who voted for him in Delhi and now the country is paying for their sins). His numerous u-turns, double speak on free market; votebank politics (reaching out to some of the most virulent mullahs) betray a much deeper and a sinister agenda. You get a glimpse of this agenda when his minions talk about surrendering J&K or supporting the Maoists or known terrorists (like Afzal Guru). It is increasingly becoming clear to all but the cult followers that Kejriwal, the self professed anarchist, is a virulent communist for whom his vision of India has to be achieved no matter what the cost and sacrifice. The anti-corruption campaign is just a ruse which he stole from Anna Hazare. In fact everything about this man is a lie. A trivial example of his deception is that he lives in a house worth well over a crore and he wears a plastic sandal in winter. That is not simplicity; that is a carefully cultivated image (like Lalloo Yadav rustic haircut) to fool his cult followers. As the Urdu poet Abdullah Kamaal says in the following couplet:

mai.n ne apane chehare pe sab hunar sajaaye the

faash kar gayaa mujh ko saadaa pairahan meraa

[faash = reveal; pairahan = shirt / dress]

(Translation: I had decorated my face with an image which was betrayed by my simple shirt)

His latest stunt in Mumbai where his so called Aam Aadmi act brought a bustling Mumbai economy to a halt is another example of his reckless hypocrisy. The real aam aadmi is paying dearly for Arvind Kejriwal’s aam aadmi act.

SZ Ahmad in an article extolling Kejriwal says that Kejriwal is a true Muslim, that he has learnt everything from Islam, that he thanks Allah for blessings bestowed, that even though a Hindu, Kejriwal is a true Muslim. Whether I agree with anything that Ahmad says, I certainly agree with one thing. Kejriwal has picked up stuff from Quran i.e. Al Taqiyya. This man is going to lie and cheat to get what he wants. I don’t know about the positive stuff but Kejriwal has certainly picked that from Islam.

Delhi voters and the Indian media pimps have created a monster which cannot be contained anymore. It is also clear that his brain washed cult will swallow whatever he spits out. It is up to the rest of us to ensure that this man is denied the publicity he so craves and eventually consigned to the dustbin of history.

Every Indian who is not a politician or a babu wants corruption to be eradicated. You do not have to be an anarchist or a communist to be an anti corruption crusader. Even the worst of his detractors has not called Narendra Modi corrupt (except for High priest and Pope Kejriwal who is going around certifying various people and assessing development). Because of his personal integrity, people around Modi are forced to stay clean. That is the real solution to corruption.

I would not advice it but if you have to read it then SZ Ahmad’s article can be read at: 
http://muslimmirror.com/eng/kejriwal-a-hindu-by-faith-a-muslim-by-practice/

It Is Modi Versus Modi In 2014

My friend Swami told me about a town hall kind of meeting on Facebook which was hosted by Madhu Trehan. It turns out that Modi was to be THE guest but with the involvement of NDTV in the event, they tried to turn it into an American style meeting where all the aspirants for the top job answer similar questions and are judged by the voters. It is clear what Trehan and NDTV were looking at – an interview with Narendra Modi which would have been a coup of sorts, not to mention a TRP juggernaut with lots of advertisement money. The bigger question (for a Modi supporter like me) is what Modi gets out of it?

By appearing in this kind of a show, the participants try to show who the better candidate is. But for a clear cut front runner like Modi, this is a lose-lose proposition. Once on the show, he would be at the mercy of his enemies i.e. the media. He would not be able to walk off the interview (like he did with that jerk Thapar) without sounding petulant. On the interview he would have gone up against an upstart trouble maker like Kejriwal and a parolee like Lalloo Yadav (Thank you brother Shashi Shekhar). Does Modi need to prove that he is better than Kejriwal or Lalloo? Needless to say, I was very happy when Swami told me that Modi had withdrawn his name from this event.

But this raises a bigger question. Who is Modi running against? Why do the Indian media keep insisting that Kejriwal is a credible opponent to Modi or (miraculously) Rahul is more popular than Modi in TN even though the man is a walking disaster? They do so because the media needs to keep the drama alive and show that they are still relevant in this day and age of social media (where the candidate can directly connect with the voters – see our post http://thenethindu.blogspot.com/2014/02/narendra-modi-bypasses-media.html). What the media are really loath to admit is that Modi is running against himself. Now let us step back and examine the statement. We have two questions.

Who is Modi running against?

Who exactly has the power to stop Modi from becoming the PM?

As far as the first question goes, is it Rahul or Kejriwal or Mamata or Jayalalitha or Nitish or Mulayam or Lalloo? Even if you take the rigged pre-election polls with a fistful of salt, you can safely say that Rahul will NOT be the next PM. Now who else can lay claim to the top job. For that we will have to answer the second question. The only thing that stops Modi from becoming the PM is a hung parliament when one of the vulture-like politicians will swoop in by favorably positioning themselves. This is what Nitish, Jayalalitha and others are hoping. How can Modi stop that from happening? Effective campaigning is the key. Modi has honed this skill in the last three elections in Gujarat where he went up against a tsunami of negativity and still won. He has to be the most vetted politician on the earth so he has nothing to hide. All he needs to do is to connect with those voters who have either not heard about him or are reluctant to vote for him because he belongs to BJP (please read http://thenethindu.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-quandary-of-supporting-modi-but-not.html). From what we are seeing, the man is running an unprecedented campaign with targeted speeches and fantastic oratory. For a while it looked like his own partymen would impede his progress but he has since bested them. He now seems to be going from strength to strength. If he continues on this path then the figure of 272 can be achieved without making Faustian pacts. If he stumbles now or makes a bad decision then things can become uncertain. Only Modi can stop Modi. Yes it truly is Modi versus Modi in the next election.

BJP / NDA Need At Least 250 Seats

It is not enough to form the next government for BJP. They have to do so in a way that was much better than Atalji’s government. It was a motley crew or parties who used Atalji’s government like an ATM. Unscrupulous partners like Chandrababu Naidu (who abandoned BJP and now trying to worm his way back) held the central government at ransom. In a situation like that, most of the time and energy was spent keeping these disparate parties happy. Governance became a secondary issue. The nation can’t afford a repeat of that.

Akali Dal and Shiv Sena are ideological partners of the BJP and thus can always be counted on. Which why even after all the posturing, the three parties stood together once the campaign began. Now in an ideal world the BJP alone would cross the 272 mark because that would free up Bhai Narendra’s hands to implement his vision of India. That is why they are running the 272+ campaign. The seats brought in by SAD and SS would be added benefit. Next best thing would be that BJP+SAD+ exceed 272 since the other two are ideologically committed to the same goal. The aforementioned scenarios are desirable but difficult as of today’s date.

Even if you draw a fuzzy conclusion by the pre-election polls (which have been shown to be extremely compromised), the BJP+SAD+SS look to be hovering around 225. Even if you counted the TDP with 10 seats and LJP with 4 seats, we are still ways away from the goal. If this were the case in May then Modi will form the government but with the help of either Mamata Aapa (didi in Urdu) or Jaya Amma or both. This will be a repeat of Atalji’s government. These women are unpredictable and mercurial ergo disastrous for stability. What we need (if we absolutely have to) are people like Paswan and Naveen Patnaik whose greed for power makes them predictable and controllable or K Chandrasekhar Rao of Telangana Rashtra Samiti who would need constant help from the Central Government for the new state. These three will probably bring in close to 30 seats. Now if the BJP+SAD+SS get 250+ then we can have a stable government.

Therefore barring the ideal situation, the BJP+SAD+SS really need to hit the 250 mark. Seeing the way, Bhai Narendra Modi is campaigning, I have great hopes. His rallies and unfolding strategies in various states tell me that they are on top of all the issues which is a remarkable change from 2004 and 2009 when hope and entitlement were the BJP’s strategy. All we need is a good voter turnout.

The Quandary Of Supporting Modi But Not The BJP

One of the most confounding of the stats in these days of stat attacks is the high percentage of voters’ support for Narendra Modi and low support for the BJP in some states. In a presidential style of democracy it makes sense. However in a parliamentary system, it is impossible. Be that as it may, it certainly says a few things about the status quo. I will try collating my thoughts on the matter a way out of this.

1. The lack of support for the BJP even in the face of extreme anti incumbency tells you the abject lack of leadership in the BJP during the last ten years of LK Advani. His entire tenure was to let regional parties thrive under the assumption that they would come back the NDA fold when needed. He left the states to selfish and incompetent leaders in charge of states in exchange for their loyalty while he trying to position himself for the right place and right time.

2. Are the voters confused about our parliamentary system where you have to vote for the party to get the PM. A rather large number of polled voters support regional parties in the general election but want Modi as PM. Either they are confused about our system or their regional aspirations trump any national considerations. These voters are going to handicap the next government by denying a clear majority to a possible Modi government which would hamper implementation of decisions, tough or otherwise, essential for our future.

3. The solution to this quandary may lie in careful marketing. They need to see Narendra Modi in person on stage adorned by BJP paraphernalia, with local BJP leaders. This association may force the realization that the man and the party are inseparable even though he is running a presidential style campaign. With one moth remaining, this may be easier said than done. However, Modi and his team of brilliant organizers and campaigners have organized very large number of campaign rallies across the nation. It remains to be seen if the rallies of the past and future will any and all doubts about Modi and the party he belongs to.

Narendra Modi Bypasses Media

Try to imagine CM Narendra Modi in pre-internet days trying to get the word out about his performance, good governance and abilities to the rest of the country. He would have been helpless in the face of a combined attack from Congress Bureau of investigation, the pseudo-secular leftist media and the NGOs with equally nefarious agendas. Yes in pre-internet days, Congress would have easily destroyed Narendra Modi.

In those days, the media vultures would shoot off whatever popped into their petty little heads with no fear of a rebuttal. As long as they went along with whatever Congress was doing they had all the power and absolutely no responsibility. It was only during emergency period when some honest and objective journalists took on Indira Gandhi and her machine that they found themselves at the receiving end. I knew a journalist who suffered in those days. He was a man of character and cast iron spine who was a leftist but the kind you have to admire. The journalists these days are leftist only in name. Otherwise they criminally unscrupulous about money (Sanghvi and Barkha Dutt involved in the 2G scam is just one example). These so called star journalists have the morals of sleazy lawyer.

Coming back to the arrogant attitudes of Indian media mavens, even today they shoot off absurd and low class tweets about Hindu nationalists and conservatives (read anything by that despicable couple Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose). They used to get away with anything. Not anymore. As we have said repeatedly on this blog, the Internet has been a great equalizer. Any person with a camera phone and a social media account is a journalist. When the Congress tried to host controlled media appearances of Rahul Gandhi, these cell phone journalists exposed the truth about him.

In the internet age of social media, trends, instant opinion poll and instant responses and rebuttals by anyone with internet access has forced the media vultures into some accountability. Sagarika Ghose’s vitriolic tweets are matched with equal if not more vitriol. Congress snobs who would indulge in all kinds of name calling without expecting any rebuttal are beating a hasty retreat. One of the knocks on the saffron supporter was that they were part of a vernacular speaking unsophisticated silent but subservient majority. Not anymore.

This is what Narendra Modi who is clearly a visionary, realized early on. He saw the advantages of the social media and built an enviable network with dedicated supporters. Even though he is less educated in these areas than the likes of Arvind Kejriwal or Sam Pitroda, he has used this platform and the technology to the envy of many experts. The biggest advantage for Modi was that with this platform he would directly connect with the voters, completely bypassing the media pimps and their biases. It is thanks to this approach that Modi was able to deal with ten years of incessant attacks by various pro-Congress groups and agencies and still win three terms with comfortable majority. And if all this was not enough to convince you of his absolute mastery over the new technology he pulls out another trick out of the bag. To appreciate the brilliance of the “Chai pe Charcha”, you have to view it along with the much touted Janata Darbar that the much more qualified IIT educated engineer Arvind Kejriwal held. You remember that the darbar was a colossal flop and Kejriwal had to flee the venue. A much more cost effective, efficient and safe way was demonstrated by the Chai pe Charcha campaign where the use of internet and teleconferencing Modi could not only talk with real voters but also field very relevant and clearly spontaneous questions. This is even better than the elections in the west where candidates go out to public places and meet up with voters or hold those town hall meetings. I am sure this will get emulated in the west very soon.

Modi has found a way to bypass the media and directly connect with the voters. Now connecting the two is the job of the media but because of their biases, they could never do so in a fair manner. Modi has taught them a lesson. He is fielding tough questions by real people instead of made up, agenda driven media interlocutors. Maybe now Sagarika Ghose can shut up about Modi’s reluctance to be interviewed.

Two of our posts on related topics can be read at:
http://thenethindu.blogspot.com/2011/01/indian-media-vs-internet-hindus.html
http://thenethindu.blogspot.com/2013/12/congress-media-vultures-vs-saffron.html

Kejriwal Is Lying To Win Battle Of Perception

In authoritarian regimes or cults or religions (the kind that grow by conversions) or personality based political ideologies the importance of the person in charge or the fount of message / ideology is paramount. Since the leaders or the messengers (as much as we would like to believe in their divinity) are human and thus beset with usual follies, perception of their abilities or their strength becomes a substitute. Therefore in establishing their rule or reign as the case maybe, the battle of perception becomes very important.

AAP is one of those personality based political cult led by their supreme leader Arvind Kejriwal. For the outsider who has followed this man since the Anna Hazare movement, he is no more than a political Arundhati Roy. What I mean is that just like her, he likes to stay in the limelight, usurping other people’s agenda. She stood next to Medha Patkar usurping her agenda. This man has done the same to Anna Hazare. In that way he is a selfish credit hog. If it weren’t for Hazare, no one would know this guy.

In his course to where he is now, he has lied, made false promises (even a bad student at the IITs knows what is feasible and what is not. Believe me. I was one), made so many u-turns that even he does not know which direction is he facing. He has lied about his job (if he were such a crusader in the IT department, he would be suffering like Ashok Khemka instead of playing a crusader) plagiarized a book ( as accused by Ajay Pal Nagar), used influence (the very VIP culture he pretends to loathe) to stay in New Delhi instead of getting transferred, compromised on so many things (like getting support of Congress and in the process turning a blind eye to the sins of Dixit and Vadra). For people who are not under his spell, his administration has done nothing but dharnas and vigilantism.

Now if we can see this entire spectrum of deception and ineptitude then why can those who are supporting him and joining him see the same? That is the bigger question. Who are all these lemming like followers and why are they supporting a losing cause and hell bent on wasting their votes?

These people are angry citizens who have seen nothing but corruption and ineptitude from the Congress government in the last ten years and they are tired of it. So are we. They want a change. So do we. They want a clean performing government. So do we. However, our approach to the change is where we differ. These people hold the BJP in equal contempt. Well, we BJP supporters were not exactly endorsing the Advani led party either (which would explain his defeat in 2009 and the party’s defeat in several assembly elections). However, we are much more realistic about our political situation. We know that there are only two real options for India – Congress or the BJP. The third front is an alliance of parties even worse than Congress and in that voting for them is a waste of votes. We also know that an Advani led BJP would have been a marginal improvement over Congress. However, with Narendra Modi as PM, the BJP is a different party. Now the AAP supporters are pseudo-secular middle class Hindus (who would have been loath to vote for Modi anyway), ex-Congress supporters like Muslims (would not vote for Modi) or the poorer voters who want immediate relief (and thus fall for false promises). It is this band of people that Kejriwal is trying to attract and he is doing so with the same tools as people mentioned in the first paragraph of this blog.

A man who lives in a house over a crore and whose family takes vacations abroad but wears yellow socks over plastic sandals in middle of winter is conveying something other than austerity. It is more in line with Lalloo Yadav who has cultivated a rustic look with a roadside barbered hair. The whole ensemble of Kejriwal's clothes itself is a statement in hypocrisy rather than simplicity. He and his gang have made it a habit of answering questions with counter question to evade their failures and to get out of tight spots. Their racist attitudes were masked with a self-righteous anger and political opportunism hiding their misogyny (support for the despicable Khaap panchayats). Their support for fundamentalist mullahs is nothing but continuation of Congress brand of politics. He has continued to lower expectations and bars of achievement to show progress. This subterfuge has kept his supporters in line and money pouring in (although if reports are to be believed, the NRI spigot has been turned off). Meanwhile the anti Modi media that have propped up Nitish Kumar in the past are doing the same with Kejriwal. Helping Kejriwal with his lies, they continue to prop him up as a Modi alternative. Why else would they show him as the third PM candidate after Modi and Gandhi? Now they are accusing the BJP of trying to bring down the AAP government by bribing their MLAs. A lie like this creates an unfavorable perception of BJP. Anyone who follows politics can see that AAP is on a self destruct mode and bribing the AAP MLAs does not yield any political dividends on the national level. This is typical of AAP, stooping to conquer.

AAP is a mirage and perception, carefully managed by a smart man whose every statement is an exercise in deception and every move a self propagating sleight of hand and every act a shameless exercise in self aggrandizing. His shameless pursuit of power is being buoyed by the pathologically anti Modi pseudo-secular middle class and the English language media. Arvind Kejriwal is clearly winning the battle of perception. It is up to the Indian voters to stop this menace by casting their votes realistically rather than wasting their vote in a self righteous protest.

A related article can be read at: http://www.niticentral.com/2014/01/16/8-lies-that-nailed-kejriwal-179886.html
The article on plagiarism can be read at: http://news.oneindia.in/new-delhi/noida-based-writer-registers-plagiarism-case-against-arvind-kejriwal-1386445.html

The Real Challenge for BJP

We are witnessing Congress at crossroads. They are a party which is in dire need of reinvention. Current leadership has got to go. From the looks of it, 2014 elections are going to mirror Congress’ performance of the state elections of November 2013. They are not a challenge to BJP. We are also witnessing an implosion of the AAP. Kejriwal and his cronies stand exposed as garden variety Communists who are stuck in the student union mode. They have bitten the hand that feeds them (Indian media), suckered by Congress, disillusioned their middle class supporters by their vigilantism (word that should be used is “Gunda-gardi”). Now it seems that the NRIs have turned the money spigot off. They are also not going to be a threat to the BJP.

The third front which is also a media creation like AAP and Nitish Kumar seems like a non-starter. Jayalalitha who was a supporter of Non-conversions laws has since joined up with Islamist parties and now CPI (M). This is a person who attended Modi’s inauguration has made a radical turnaround. Bereft of any kind of coherent ideology, she is nursing dreams of the PM chair. She and other regional party leaders are going to meet under the auspices of CPI (M) to form the third front. Apparently these people learn nothing from history and are going to repeat it. 2004 Lok Sabha was the best chance for the third front when the left front had 64 seats and Mulayam’s SP had 36 seats. Despite Harkishan Singh Surjit’s best attempts at reconciliation, they could not agree on who should become the CM. Now they have multiple leaders in their late sixties who look upon this election as their last chance for PM’ship. NO way are these guys going to agree on who should lead the third front.

It is becoming increasingly clear that Narendra Modi is a rare politician; the like world rarely gets to see. Yes, the WORLD. In an election which is being held in a disparate country like ours with over 700 million voters, to have such a sway over the voters speaks for his political genius. His is an inspiring speaker with the organizational capabilities and decision making ability of a successful army commander. His success as a three term CM who has captured the imagination of the Indian voter has already cemented his legacy whether he wins or not. Now the real question here – Why would he not win despite of all these advantages? My theory is as follows.

Complacency, arrogance and low voter turnout are going to defeat the BJP and stop Modi. We have so many polls coming out indicating the BJP as the front runner with 220 or so seats. With that many seats and opportunist politicians of other parties Modi will be able to form the government. Advani and his group ignored key states in the past. They assumed the support of BJD, AIDMK et.al. and let BJP become non-factors in those states. They assumed that with 150 to 180 seats and support of these vultures they will be able to form the government. This sort of complacency will lead to an inherently unstable government, susceptible to blackmail by unscrupulous partners. Modi will never be able to implement his pro-growth agenda.

I do not trust any of these polls. It is not possible to get a statistically viable sample of the voter base in India. Moreover, with the kind of literacy and attitudes that we have in our country it is very hard to get nuanced answer (Do you strongly agree or somewhat agree kind of questions). And that is just one of the problems. The best we can get is an idea about the way the voter is leaning. It is also hard to trust any of the pollsters given the Congress’ and the leftist influence. Therefore one needs to be very suspicious of the projected number of seats because that can make the foot soldiers arrogant and stop them from doing their best. I am not worried about Modi because he seems to be going from strength to strength with every speech. He is fighting for every seat which is what every one of us should be doing.

Of all the campaigning or rallies with huge turnouts will not amount to much if the voters decide that it is too hot (or some other equally inane reason) to go out to vote. Also the disillusioned section of the middle class needs to refrain from casting a protest vote for a party which has no hope to win. Protest votes maybe cool in a student union election and not with the future of the nation at stake. BJP voter base should not only expand but step out in the hot sun to cast their votes.

Of course we also pray for a long life for Bhai Narendra Modi so that he can serve his country to the best of his abilities and that all of are part of this journey which our nation rightfully deserves.

Aam Aadmi Party – First Myth

Sunil Rajguru, who is a kindred spirit, has written an article which is in line with some of our own theories. He beat us to the punch and kudos to him. He has listed seven myths about the Aam Aadmi party. Here we are going to go through each myth and add our own opinion to it.

AAP is in the league of Congress and BJP.

Make no mistake about it. The Congress has the largest political network in India. Nobody comes even close. They have the maximum number or workers and loyalists spread all across India.

In second place is the RSS network. RSS workers all across the country have dedicated their lives to serve their cause and the BJP piggy backs on this. The RSS-BJP network is the second largest political one in India. Both the top two networks have been as a result of millions and millions of man hours spread across decades and decades of hard work.

The AAP network is gaining traction for sure, but could emerge as India's third largest network only in 2019. To place them in the league of the Big 2 in 2014 is laughable.

The truth is that the AAP is in competition with the BJD, Trinamool, SP, BSP, DMK, ADMK… and it is conceivable that many of these parties will get more LS seats than the AAP.

Sunil makes valid points about the existing networks of established parties. In my opinion, the AAP also can match or come close to the number of volunteers of Congress or RSS or BJP. However a large number of volunteers do not make an effective organization. What the AAP does not have at ground levels outside of Delhi is a structured organization with well defined leadership. They need to develop leaders at every level who can then manage the incoming volunteers otherwise they are going to have repeats of the disastrous Janata Darbar experiment.

It has taken over a decade of good governance for Modi to be known all over the country. How can Arvind Kejriwal with no governance to show for or no other form of name recognition expect to make a difference in non-metropolitan areas? With that in mind, one has to ask this question – is the proposal of Kejriwal / AAP as a national alternative a trick to rattle the BJP supporter? It is quite clear even to the stupidest that the AAP can at best be a spoiler of sorts.

Sunil also makes a good point when he says that the best AAP can expect is to be in the league with the regional parties. However, the regional parties have a united voter base due to their regional aspiration, myopic as they may be. However, the supporters of the AAP are a disjointed lot with only anti-corruption as the only major issue to unite them. Beyond that the AAP is nothing but another form of the Communist Party. When the middle class supporters of the AAP will be forced to reconsider their support when they realize the following:

a. That there are other anti-corruption crusaders who are fighting it without making tall claims and in a more prudent way.
b. That the AAP policies on national security are downright disastrous and following them will be playing in the hands of terrorists of all kinds (Islamic, Maoist, Naxals).
c. That the economic policies of the AAP are regurgitation of Marxist policies which will take India back a few decades.
d. That the populist moves made so far are a knee jerk reaction rather than well thought out policies. Has the AAP ever thought of who is going to pay for the freebies?
e. That the pre-election statements of the AAP and the post election behavior of the AAP leaders do not match. Kejriwal swore on his children about coalition forming and here we are! His so called austere movements (followed quietly by other leaders in the country) are costing the taxpayer a lot more. Doing about turns is not unique to Kejriwal but he is the one who makes a huge deal about it and therefore comes through as a bigger hypocrite than the rest of Indian politicians. Moreover, all his bluster about going after Dixit and other corrupt leaders of earlier administration has been sacrificed at the altar of coalition politics. Nabbing meter readers and corrupt constables will solve nothing.

Like them or not, Congress and BJP have a history and people know what they stand for. They know that voting for Congress means a repeat of the last (or lost) decade. Voting for BJP means implementation of policies that have worked brilliantly in Gujarat. However, voting for AAP means a protest vote. Indian voter cannot afford to waste their vote with the future of the country at stake.

AAP needs to work for another decade and only then they can make a claim to be a national alternative. Until then they remain a rag tag outfit, fit only for hit and run kind of operations

The picture is a modified picture from lighthousewebdesigns.com

Aam Aadmi Party – Second Myth

Sunil Rajguru, who is a kindred spirit, has written an article which is in line with some of our own theories. He beat us to the punch and kudos to him. He has listed seven myths about the Aam Aadmi party. Here we are going to go through each myth and add our own opinion to it.

AAP and BJP share the same voter base.

The Indian middle class voted NDA1 to power and it powered the anti-corruption and anti-rape agitations. When Kejriwal was on the verge of launching the AAP, then there were a good number of people who loved both the BJP and AAP. But things ended there.
The AAP adopted a Communist Manifesto and campaigned in the jhuggi jhopdis of Delhi. An example is how Kejriwal seems more sympathetic to auto drivers rather than auto commuters.
The middle class is a pampered lot and have no need for freebies and are getting alienated from the AAP.
Then there's Kejriwal meeting a cleric who issued a fatwa against Taslima Nasreen and Prashant Bhushan saying it's OK for Kashmir to separate from India: All that happens to be the exact opposite of the BJP ideology!
The AAP will eat heavily into the vote share of the Congress and the CPM with whom they have great ideological similarities.

There is some overlap in the BJP and AAP voter base. And this is what is feeding into the media frenzy. Both have supporters in the middle class. However, the great Indian middle class has subdivisions. We have the pseudo-secular liberal middle class who think they are above everyone else. This section of people stays in walled compounds passing judgments on those who are more in tune with ground realities. These are the people who are beholden to a strong sense of self entitlement and constantly demand special treatment based on their “connections”. To assuage some of that guilt (in my opinion) they often go out and support leftist causes. The second section is Hindu conservatives who clearly seem to have a better understanding of ground realities and are god fearing, temple going patriots. This section of the middle class Indians are dedicated BJP supporters and are not going to change their votes because the prejudiced and biased Indian media told them to do so. The BJP CAN break away voters from the former while holding on to their base. It is because as soon as these hypocritical liberals realize that the AAP manifesto is nothing but a Communist manifesto with a different name and those policies are going hurt them in the pocket, they will be forced to reconsider.

The semi-urban and rural voters have no way to connect to AAP. Anna Hazare’s movement was of a different kind and it also had time to connect with small town India. AAP does not have time and have to behave like a political party rather than a movement. They will find it difficult to get similar support as they did in their activist avatar.

Sunil is right in saying that the AAP ended up appealing to the same vote bank as that of all the non-BJP parties. Pandering to the Muslims removed any doubt to AAP’s plan of action. Now they have criminals from JD(U) joining the party. Is there any doubt that these guys are just another vote-bank political party and Kejriwal is another Nitish Kumar?

The picture is a modified picture from lighthousewebdesigns.com

Aam Aadmi Party – Third Myth

Sunil Rajguru, who is a kindred spirit, has written an article which is in line with some of our own theories. He beat us to the punch and kudos to him. He has listed seven myths about the Aam Aadmi party. Here we are going to go through each myth and add our own opinion to it.

An Assembly success can be replicated in the Lok Sabha.

Parties successful in one Assembly find it very tough to branch out nationally. Just because the AAP has been successful in the Delhi Assembly (people keep missing the main point that it came second and not first in the Assembly) doesn't mean it will translate into Lok Sabha success.
The Maharashtra Gomantak Party, the Asom Gana Parishad and the Telugu Desam Party all have had greater Assembly debuts. But the party to consider is the BSP. The BSP saw spectacular success in UP but failed to go national despite both Kanshi Ram and Mayawati trying their best in other states and there being a readymade Dalit vote bank all across India.
Delhi has the smallest of Assembly segments where an intense campaign can work. In comparison, Lok Sabha constituencies are huge and the AAP will have to fight it out for every single one.

One other example that Sunil missed out was that of Shiv Sena. They have dominated the Mumbai politics for decades but have not been able to duplicate the same success at the state level let alone nationally.

In Delhi, AAP’s campaign was aided by an extreme anti incumbency mood. The BJP did not offer any real alternative until the last moment (and because of that they almost pulled out a victory). AAP had almost a year to campaign and thus could hold those street corner meetings and a door to door campaign. Small size of the state and a homogenous, readymade liberal voter base helped them in garnering close to 30% of the votes. To replicate this model of campaign on a national level is not possible for already established parties let alone an upstart group like the AAP. In 2009, Congress spent close to 450 crores and BJP spent 250 crores on the general elections. Pragmatically speaking, volunteers and small donations cannot match that kind of money (I do not like the big money dominating politics but that is unavoidable).

Kejriwal is their star campaigner (more so because the others suffer from the disease of saying the wrong things at the wrong time) and he went against a mild mannered Dr. Harshvardhan and maligned Sheila Dixit. On a national level, he will be pitted against Narendra Modi whose election rallies have unnerved even the Congress. It will be pragmatism versus populism. It will be vision versus lack thereof. It will be self reliance versus begging. It will be pride versus victimhood. It will be nationalism versus self loathing. It will be roaring self confidence versus whimpering self doubt. It will be “I am responsible” versus “You are guilty”. Believe me, if it comes to Modi versus Kejriwal, it will not even be a contest.

The success in Delhi was a huge surprise to the AAP as well. That is obvious because the way their representatives were behaving after the results came out. There were not prepared for any eventuality. They had not considered all or any possibilities. Even now, it does not look like they have a plan. They are just winging it as the day goes by. Does this sound to you like a national party? No matter how hard the Indian media screams, a crow can never walk like a peacock. What worked in Delhi will never work at the national level.

The picture is a modified picture from lighthousewebdesigns.com

Aam Aadmi Party – Fourth Myth

Sunil Rajguru, who is a kindred spirit, has written an article which is in line with some of our own theories. He beat us to the punch and kudos to him. He has listed seven myths about the Aam Aadmi party. Here we are going to go through each myth and add our own opinion to it.

You can win a national campaign within 6 months.

The Congress was formed in 1885 and came to power in 1947. The RSS was formed in 1925 and the Bharatiya Sangh was formed in 1951 and they came to power in 1977. The BJP was formed in 1980 and came to power in 1996.
Even being a credible Opposition is not easy. The CPI was formed in 1925. C Rajagopalachari was our first Governor General in 1948 but his Swatantra Party formed in 1959 took 8 years to become the principal Opposition in 1967.
No party can conquer a large, rich diverse country as India in a matter of months. And Kejriwal is no Mahatma Gandhi or Jawaharlal Nehru.

Right again but Sunil does not mention one thing i.e. the change in the national polity with regional and caste-based aspirations overtaking national interests. Congress and Bhartiya Janasangh are two different pre-independence ideas, largely agreeing on the national interest issues. Now the regional parties often force Indian strategies. When talking to important neighbors like Sri Lanka and Bangla Desh, the GoI has to defer to the CM’s of Tamilnadu and WB respectively. Caste lines have become much sharper. It will be hard for any party to form government at the center on their own. The best one can hope is to cross a certain 200+ seat magic mark after which post poll alliance formation becomes easy. AAP whose power base is Delhi is not projected to win more than a couple of seats in New Delhi where the voters are a lot more homogenous than the rest of the nation. I do not see them winning any seats in Mumbai where the contest is going to be multi cornered with regional and caste lines sharply drawn.

As Sunil says, a party will need a charismatic leader who can galvanize the country behind him or her to make a case for national prominence in six months. Kejriwal does not fit that bill. The reason why the AAP is getting so many volunteers (the numbers are being overstated by the media in that you have to compare the AAP supporters with let’s say the NaMo brigade to get the feel for AAP momentum) is because undecided liberal voters have decided to club Congress as well as the BJP together as part of the establishment. By going to AAP, they are trying to vote against establishment. In a way they are right. The BJP has so far done a few things that are quite similar to Congress in parts. Propping up Vijay Goel was a BJP establishment move. Rajnath Singh / Narendra Modi who are outsiders brought in Dr. Harshvardhan and immediately changed BJP’s fortunes in Delhi. There were four seats in Delhi that the BJP lost by less than a total of 2000 votes. The point is that with Modi’s induction, the BJP is no longer Advani’s party and can now claim to be the party that they set out to be. Voting for Modi is no longer a vote for the status quo.

Sooner or later Kejriwal will have to hit the campaign trail to make a national case for AAP. He will have to talk about his vision of India (which he claims to lack) and real solutions to serious problems. While Modi has chalked out plans that have already worked and are implementable nationally, Kejriwal will have to say Lokpal as an answer to all the problems. He will be exposed. He needs a lot more than just protest votes to win. Not only does he lack the charisma and oratory of Modi but his message in extremely one dimensional. In short, the AAP does not have the requisite stuff to make a national case for them.

The picture is a modified picture from lighthousewebdesigns.com