If you understand the concept of “Hum-kitaab” you can understand the mutual respect between Muslims and Christians. “Hum-kitaab” refers to overlap between Bible and Quran. No such overlap exists between Hinduism and those religions which would explain constant mistrust rather than mutual respect between the west and India. While it did not erase it, some of the mutual respect between Christians and Muslims evaporated in the aftermath of the 9/11 carnage.
It is quite amazing that despite of repeated proofs of the peace loving nature of Hinduism we are still looked upon as some sort of brain washed cult followers. On the flip side despite well-established penchant for violence demonstrated by Muslims, they continue to find favors with the west. In fact if it was not for Israel and the anti-Jewish violence and hatred demonstrated by the Muslims we would be deeper waters.
The history of raj days especially that of British dealings with Hindus and Muslims and eventually India and Pakistan depends a lot on whom you listen to. Muslims / pakis / Indian liberals will tell you one story while the nationalists will tell you another. Being a nationalist myself, I tend to believe the latter. While their version of history can be debated, the results of their version is there for all to see.
Of course if you go back in our History, it is quite obvious that the British preferred dealing with Muslims. It clearly went beyond their “divide and rule” policy. It could have been due to their familiarity with Islam. If we look at the goings on during the partition, it is clear that the British thought that a Muslims Pakistan would be a better bulwark against spread of communism. They conveyed this to the American who then went to ally with the pakis. This alliance was so precious to them that they chose not to tell Nehru about the impending attack by the Pakistani army on J&K which resulted on the loss of huge amount of land in J&K to Pakistanis who then went and gifted some of it to the Chinese. Clear case of Pakistan over India. Go a decade ahead and you will see another blunder by the Brits. When cloth mill workers were needed in England then chose to import all those workers from Pakistan (current day accounts say that Indian workers were taken as well but that is a lie or a token number of workers may have been taken). Those workers are now part of the establishments (as in voters and politicians) and their children are creating a havoc in England. Britain has become a steady source of terrorists to the world now. We saw the terrorists associated with the Finsbury Park Mosque. Now we are seeing a steady stream of British Muslim terrorists into Iraq. The ISIS superstar Jihadi John if from London. Things have become so bad that people refer to London as Londonistan. All this is because of the British policy of appeasement. The British conservative will have you believe that it is because of political correctness. Are these the same people who killed 1500 people in Jallianwallah? Are these the same people who led by Churchill denied tens of lakhs of famine victims of Bengal any relief because they could not take away any resources from British navy? These people ruthlessly ruled India and now they are telling that they are helpless at the hands of Labor Party / Liberal media’s political correctness? Of course if you look at the Indian immigrants and their children in England who are doing exceedingly well, the current state of British Muslims becomes a real head scratcher. It is clear that over two centuries of rule did not teach them the difference between Hindus and Muslims. Either that or they refused to do so because of their extreme hatred for us.
If the British policies of the past and recent past are yielding so many terrorists then aren’t the British responsible for them? It started off with Biryani and now it is bombs. If Jihadi John is beheading American and Israeli journalists and a British muslim woman is running a brothel with Yazidi girls for the muslim terrorists of ISIS amongst other atrocities, then what is the culpability of the British government?
If this were not bad enough another example of bad British policies has reared its ugly head in the town of Rotterham. This what was said in a report by John 'O Sullivan:
Britain has felt real shock and horror over the report that 1,400 young women in the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham had been groomed, raped, prostituted, trafficked, and brutally abused in almost every possible way by a criminal gang for the last 16 years.
This what was said in another article:
The researcher, who was seconded to Rotherham council by the Home Office, was told she must "never, ever" again refer to the fact that the abusers were predominantly Asian men.
Speaking to the BBC's Panorama programme under the condition of anonymity, the researcher said that she identified more 270 victims of trafficking and underage prostitution by mainly Muslim gangs in Rotherham.
One only has to read any one of the dozens of articles written to read about the brutality inflicted on these girls. These girls may have been wayward and unloved at home but they deserved better. They were collectively let down by the British society in the name of political correctness. Hindus are quite capable of inflicting unspeakable cruelties as was witnessed in the Nirbahaya Rape case. However, the way the Pakistanis carried out this systematically is what blows one’s mind. We can see that in some articles which try to point the blame at vote-bank politics of Muslim appeasement in England (sounds familiar?). Labor party is like SP / BSP / Congress / CPI of England. It for this reason that the British liberals refer to the Pakistanis as Asians, grouping them with Indians and Chinese.
So what is my problem? Britain raised terrorists are beheading westerners but they will eventually get to us. Will the stiff upper lipped, self-righteous British society stand up and accept their culpability in these beheadings?
Why am I upset about the rapes perpetuated on British girls? It is because all this while they kept saying that Asian gangs are committing these atrocities. It is only now that some of them are getting up and saying that Pakistani men are carrying out these systematic and brutal atrocities. My appeal to the Brits is as follows: Indians in England (on an average) doing better than the white natives. You know what and where the Pakistanis (on an average) are. So please differentiate between Indians and Pakistanis. We are not the same. You should know. You created the two countries.
What started off with Biryani let to Bombs and beheadings and now “Balaatkaar”? The British are responsible for what is going on in their country. I am not taking pleasure in all this but I could not pass up an opportunity to say – I told you so!
Articles mentioned above can be read at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/387428/1400-english-girls-raped-multiculturalism-dennis-prager
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11069178/Rotherham-researcher-sent-on-diversity-course-after-raising-alarm.html
No comments:
Post a Comment